Screener
IGRO vs CGIC
iShares International Dividend Growth ETF vs Capital Group International Core Equity ETF
Key differences
- IGRO costs 0.39% less per year.
- IGRO follows a index tracking strategy; CGIC uses active selection.
- IGRO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGRO | CGIC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $1.7B |
| Since | 2016 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.39% | 1.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.0% | +30.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.50% | 14.96% |
| Max drawdown | -36.25% | -13.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IGRO and CGIC
Explore further