Screener
IHF vs INRO
iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF vs iShares U.S. Industry Rotation Active ETF
Key differences
- IHF is significantly larger than INRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IHF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IHF | INRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.42% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $777M | $31M |
| Since | 2006 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.11% | 0.69% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.9% | +32.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +1.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.01 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.56% | 12.92% |
| Max drawdown | -35.23% | -20.02% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IHF and INRO
Explore further