Screener
IHF vs IWL
iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
Key differences
- IWL costs 0.23% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, IWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IHF | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $777M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2006 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 1.11% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.9% | +30.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +1.4% | +24.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.0% | +14.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.01 | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.56% | 12.34% |
| Max drawdown | -35.23% | -32.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IHF and IWL
Explore further