Screener
IHF vs PPH
iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF vs VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF
Key differences
- Over the last 3 years, PPH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IHF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IHF | PPH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $777M | $966M |
| Since | 2006 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.11% | 2.12% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.9% | +24.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +1.4% | +12.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.0% | +9.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.01 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.56% | 17.07% |
| Max drawdown | -35.23% | -29.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IHF and PPH
Explore further