Screener
IHF vs SPXV
iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF vs ProShares S&P 500 ex-Health Care ETF
Key differences
- SPXV costs 0.29% less per year.
- IHF is significantly larger than SPXV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SPXV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IHF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IHF | SPXV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $777M | $38M |
| Since | 2006 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.11% | 0.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.4% | +32.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +1.4% | +25.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.2% | +15.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.01 | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.54% | 12.80% |
| Max drawdown | -35.23% | -34.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IHF and SPXV
Explore further