Screener
IHF vs XLV
iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF vs State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
Key differences
- XLV costs 0.30% less per year.
- XLV is significantly larger than IHF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, XLV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XLV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IHF | XLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $777M | $37.9B |
| Since | 2006 | 1998 |
| Dividend yield | 1.11% | 1.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.4% | +16.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +1.4% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.2% | +5.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.01 | 0.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.54% | 14.56% |
| Max drawdown | -35.23% | -28.40% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IHF and XLV
Explore further