Screener
IIGD vs GTOC
Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF vs Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF
Key differences
- IIGD costs 0.13% less per year.
- GTOC is significantly larger than IIGD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IIGD follows a index tracking strategy; GTOC uses active selection.
- IIGD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IIGD | GTOC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.13% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $188M |
| Since | 2018 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.27% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.39 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.33% | — |
| Max drawdown | -11.48% | -2.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IIGD and GTOC
Explore further