Screener
IJK vs IWO
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
Key differences
- IJK costs 0.07% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, IWO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IJK | IWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.17% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.6B | $13.9B |
| Since | 2000 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.57% | 0.42% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.2% | +40.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.6% | +18.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.1% | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.77 | 0.72 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.09% | 21.33% |
| Max drawdown | -39.25% | -42.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IJK and IWO
Explore further