Screener
IJR vs BLCR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF vs iShares Large Cap Core Active ETF
Key differences
- IJR costs 0.30% less per year.
- IJR is significantly larger than BLCR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IJR covers north america markets; BLCR covers global.
- IJR follows a index tracking strategy; BLCR uses active selection.
- IJR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IJR | BLCR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.06% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $102.6B | $5.1B |
| Since | 2000 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.16% | 0.24% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.1% | +49.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.65% | 15.61% |
| Max drawdown | -44.36% | -21.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IJR and BLCR
Explore further