Screener
ILCB vs XCHG
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF vs Ab US Equity ETF
Key differences
- ILCB costs 0.47% less per year.
- ILCB follows a index tracking strategy; XCHG uses active selection.
- ILCB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ILCB | XCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $685M |
| Since | 2004 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.02% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.16% | — |
| Max drawdown | -35.30% | -9.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ILCB and XCHG
Explore further