Screener
ILCG vs IWF
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Key differences
- ILCG costs 0.14% less per year.
- IWF is significantly larger than ILCG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, ILCG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ILCG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.9B | $124.7B |
| Since | 2004 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.44% | 0.35% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.5% | +27.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.5% | +26.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.0% | +15.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.38% | 15.55% |
| Max drawdown | -35.38% | -32.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ILCG and IWF
Explore further