Screener
ILCV vs IWN
iShares Morningstar Value ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
Key differences
- ILCV costs 0.20% less per year.
- IWN is significantly larger than ILCV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| ILCV | IWN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $13.4B |
| Since | 2004 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.66% | 1.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.8% | +43.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.2% | +18.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.7% | +6.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.94% | 17.87% |
| Max drawdown | -35.53% | -46.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ILCV and IWN
Explore further