Screener
IMCG vs CGGO
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF vs Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Key differences
Both IMCG and CGGO are equity ETFs. IMCG charges 0.06% a year and CGGO 0.47%. The main difference: IMCG follows a index tracking strategy; CGGO uses active selection.
- IMCG follows a index tracking strategy; CGGO uses active selection.
- IMCG covers North America; CGGO covers global markets.
- IMCG costs 0.41% less per year.
- CGGO is much larger than IMCG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, CGGO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IMCG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IMCG | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.06% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.8B | $11.4B |
| Since | 2004 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.67% | 1.71% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.9% | +32.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.3% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.49% | 18.15% |
| Max drawdown | -35.08% | -24.90% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.