Screener
IMCV vs EPMB
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF vs Harbor Mid Cap Core ETF
Key differences
- IMCV costs 0.82% less per year.
- IMCV is significantly larger than EPMB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IMCV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IMCV | EPMB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.06% | 0.88% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $5M |
| Since | 2004 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.96% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.5% | +27.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.83% | 14.52% |
| Max drawdown | -46.33% | -8.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IMCV and EPMB
Explore further