Screener
IMF vs CTA
Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF vs Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Key differences
- IMF costs 0.10% less per year.
- CTA is significantly larger than IMF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IMF follows a managed futures strategy; CTA uses systematic alpha.
Side-by-side comparison
| IMF | CTA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $301M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.89% | 4.03% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | managed futures | systematic alpha |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.7% | +16.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.66 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.46% | 19.72% |
| Max drawdown | -15.10% | -18.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IMF and CTA
Explore further