Screener
IMFL vs EEMO
Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
Key differences
- EEMO costs 0.05% less per year.
- IMFL is significantly larger than EEMO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IMFL covers global markets; EEMO covers emerging markets.
- IMFL follows a active selection strategy; EEMO uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, EEMO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EEMO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IMFL | EEMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $957M | $13M |
| Since | 2021 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 3.02% | 1.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.7% | +51.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.6% | +25.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.80% | 24.28% |
| Max drawdown | -33.25% | -46.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IMFL and EEMO
Explore further