Screener
IMFL vs SPLV
Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
Key differences
- SPLV costs 0.09% less per year.
- SPLV is significantly larger than IMFL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IMFL covers global markets; SPLV covers north america.
- IMFL follows a active selection strategy; SPLV uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, IMFL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SPLV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IMFL | SPLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $957M | $7.2B |
| Since | 2021 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 3.02% | 2.11% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.7% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.6% | +8.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | +6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.80% | 9.71% |
| Max drawdown | -33.25% | -36.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IMFL and SPLV
Explore further