Screener
IMOM vs MTUM
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF vs iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
Key differences
- MTUM costs 0.23% less per year.
- MTUM is significantly larger than IMOM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IMOM covers global markets; MTUM covers north america.
- IMOM follows a active selection strategy; MTUM uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, MTUM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IMOM | MTUM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $153M | $24.2B |
| Since | 2015 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 2.19% | 0.69% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +49.2% | +35.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.8% | +30.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.2% | +14.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.42% | 18.65% |
| Max drawdown | -45.74% | -34.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IMOM and MTUM
Explore further