Screener
IMTB vs SCUB
iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF vs Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF
Key differences
- IMTB costs 0.24% less per year.
- IMTB is significantly larger than SCUB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IMTB follows a index tracking strategy; SCUB uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| IMTB | SCUB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.06% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $280M | $25M |
| Since | 2016 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 4.46% | 3.92% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.24 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.07% | — |
| Max drawdown | -18.15% | -0.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IMTB and SCUB
Explore further