Screener
IMTB vs VNLA
iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF vs Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF
Key differences
- IMTB costs 0.17% less per year.
- VNLA is significantly larger than IMTB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IMTB follows a index tracking strategy; VNLA uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, VNLA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IMTB | VNLA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.06% | 0.23% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $280M | $3.2B |
| Since | 2016 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 4.46% | 5.25% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.6% | +4.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.5% | +5.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.5% | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.17 | 2.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.06% | 0.65% |
| Max drawdown | -18.15% | -4.49% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IMTB and VNLA
Explore further