Screener
IMTG vs AGZ
Invesco Agency MBS ETF vs iShares Agency Bond ETF
Key differences
- AGZ is significantly larger than IMTG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IMTG follows a active selection strategy; AGZ uses index tracking.
- AGZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IMTG | AGZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.22% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15M | $552M |
| Since | 2026 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.75% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +4.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +3.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 2.61% |
| Max drawdown | -2.86% | -11.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IMTG and AGZ
Explore further