Screener
INCM vs FTOH
Franklin Income Focus ETF vs Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- INCM is significantly larger than FTOH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INCM is classified as alternative, while FTOH is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- INCM covers emerging markets markets; FTOH covers north america.
- INCM follows a multi strategy strategy; FTOH uses index tracking.
- FTOH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| INCM | FTOH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $69M |
| Since | 2023 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 5.04% | 3.34% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.28% | — |
| Max drawdown | -7.84% | -2.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INCM and FTOH
Explore further