Screener
INEQ vs CGDV
Columbia International Equity Income ETF vs Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
Key differences
- CGDV costs 0.12% less per year.
- CGDV is significantly larger than INEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INEQ covers global markets; CGDV covers north america.
- INEQ follows a index tracking strategy; CGDV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, CGDV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- INEQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| INEQ | CGDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $80M | $33.0B |
| Since | 2016 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 2.40% | 1.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.8% | +34.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | +25.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.08 | 1.48 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.63% | 11.74% |
| Max drawdown | -40.25% | -21.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INEQ and CGDV
Explore further