Screener
INKM vs CGHM
State Street Income Allocation ETF vs Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF
Key differences
- CGHM costs 0.16% less per year.
- CGHM is significantly larger than INKM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INKM is classified as mixed asset, while CGHM is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- INKM follows a active selection strategy; CGHM uses index tracking.
- INKM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| INKM | CGHM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $76M | $2.9B |
| Since | 2012 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 4.88% | 3.80% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.4% | +8.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.98% | 3.15% |
| Max drawdown | -28.58% | -5.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INKM and CGHM
Explore further