Skip to content
Screener

INMU vs AOR

iShares Intermediate Muni Income Active ETF vs iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF

INMU

iShares Intermediate Muni Income Active ETF

Annual cost

0.30%

Fund size

$489M

AOR

iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$3.6B

Key differences

INMU is a fixed income ETF, while AOR is a mixed asset ETF. INMU charges 0.30% a year and AOR 0.15%.

  • INMU is a fixed income fund, while AOR is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • AOR costs 0.15% less per year.
  • AOR is much larger than INMU. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, AOR has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • AOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

INMUAOR
Annual cost (TER)0.30%0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$489M$3.6B
Since20212008
Dividend yield3.39%2.47%
Asset classfixed incomemixed asset
Regionnorth america
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+6.9%+17.5%
CAGR 3Y+4.8%+14.1%
CAGR 5Y+1.8%+6.9%
Sharpe 3Y0.301.08
Volatility 1Y2.48%8.85%
Max drawdown-10.66%-22.95%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to INMU and AOR