Screener
INRO vs IHF
iShares U.S. Industry Rotation Active ETF vs iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF
Key differences
- IHF is significantly larger than INRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IHF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| INRO | IHF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.42% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $777M |
| Since | 2024 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.69% | 1.11% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.2% | +7.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +1.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -0.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.92% | 21.56% |
| Max drawdown | -20.02% | -35.23% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INRO and IHF
Explore further