Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

INRO vs OEF

iShares U.S. Industry Rotation Active ETF vs iShares S&P 100 ETF

INRO

iShares U.S. Industry Rotation Active ETF

BlackRock

Annual cost

0.42%

Fund size

$31M

OEF

iShares S&P 100 ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.20%

Fund size

$19.6B

Key differences

  • OEF costs 0.22% less per year.
  • OEF is significantly larger than INRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • OEF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

INROOEF
Annual cost (TER)0.42%0.20%
Fund size (AUM)$31M$19.6B
Since20242000
Dividend yield0.69%0.88%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+34.5%+33.6%
CAGR 3YN/A+25.8%
CAGR 5YN/A+16.3%
Sharpe 3YN/A1.30
Volatility 1Y12.93%12.86%
Max drawdown-20.02%-31.44%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to INRO and OEF