Screener
INTF vs BELT
iShares International Equity Factor ETF vs iShares U.S. Select Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- INTF costs 0.59% less per year.
- INTF is significantly larger than BELT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INTF follows a index tracking strategy; BELT uses index enhanced.
- INTF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTF | BELT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.16% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.4B | $9M |
| Since | 2015 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.64% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.1% | +28.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.01 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.62% | 17.21% |
| Max drawdown | -40.39% | -23.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INTF and BELT
Explore further