Screener
INTF vs DYNF
iShares International Equity Factor ETF vs iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
Key differences
- INTF costs 0.10% less per year.
- DYNF is significantly larger than INTF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INTF follows a index tracking strategy; DYNF uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, DYNF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTF | DYNF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.16% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.4B | $34.0B |
| Since | 2015 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 2.64% | 0.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.1% | +31.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.2% | +27.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.3% | +15.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.01 | 1.41 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.62% | 12.60% |
| Max drawdown | -40.39% | -34.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INTF and DYNF
Explore further