Screener
INTF vs OSEA
iShares International Equity Factor ETF vs Harbor International Compounders ETF
Key differences
- INTF costs 0.39% less per year.
- INTF is significantly larger than OSEA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, INTF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- INTF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTF | OSEA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.16% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.4B | $497M |
| Since | 2015 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 2.64% | 1.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.1% | +7.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.2% | +7.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.01 | 0.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.62% | 15.18% |
| Max drawdown | -40.39% | -18.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INTF and OSEA
Explore further