Screener
INTF vs RODM
iShares International Equity Factor ETF vs Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
Key differences
- INTF costs 0.13% less per year.
- INTF follows a index tracking strategy; RODM uses index enhanced.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTF | RODM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.16% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.4B | $1.5B |
| Since | 2015 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 2.64% | 2.81% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.1% | +28.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.2% | +20.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.3% | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.01 | 1.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.62% | 10.77% |
| Max drawdown | -40.39% | -35.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INTF and RODM
Explore further