Screener
INTF vs XJH
iShares International Equity Factor ETF vs iShares ESG Select Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
- INTF is significantly larger than XJH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, INTF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- INTF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTF | XJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.16% | 0.12% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.4B | $372M |
| Since | 2015 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 2.64% | 1.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.5% | +27.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.3% | +16.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.5% | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.01 | 0.71 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.65% | 16.49% |
| Max drawdown | -40.39% | -25.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INTF and XJH
Explore further