Screener
INTL vs CGGO
Main International ETF vs Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGGO costs 0.37% less per year.
- CGGO is significantly larger than INTL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INTL is classified as alternative, while CGGO is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- INTL follows a option income strategy; CGGO uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, CGGO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTL | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.84% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $222M | $10.1B |
| Since | 2022 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 2.37% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.7% | +32.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +20.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 0.99 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.26% | 16.59% |
| Max drawdown | -14.48% | -24.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INTL and CGGO
Explore further