Screener
INTL vs CRDT
Main International ETF vs Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF
Key differences
- INTL costs 0.15% less per year.
- INTL is significantly larger than CRDT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INTL is classified as alternative, while CRDT is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- INTL follows a option income strategy; CRDT uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTL | CRDT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.84% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $222M | $38M |
| Since | 2022 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.37% | 6.51% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.6% | +0.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.87 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.35% | 8.52% |
| Max drawdown | -14.48% | -9.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INTL and CRDT
Explore further