Screener
INTL vs FFND
Main International ETF vs One Global ETF
Key differences
- INTL costs 0.16% less per year.
- INTL is classified as alternative, while FFND is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- INTL follows a option income strategy; FFND uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FFND has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTL | FFND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.84% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $222M | $99M |
| Since | 2022 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 2.37% | 0.62% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.6% | +23.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.87 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.35% | 12.97% |
| Max drawdown | -14.48% | -47.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INTL and FFND
Explore further