Screener
INTL vs FNDF
Main International ETF vs Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
Key differences
- FNDF costs 0.59% less per year.
- FNDF is significantly larger than INTL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INTL is classified as alternative, while FNDF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- INTL covers global markets; FNDF covers global ex us.
- INTL follows a option income strategy; FNDF uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FNDF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FNDF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTL | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.84% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $222M | $23.1B |
| Since | 2022 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 2.37% | 3.01% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | global | global ex us |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.6% | +44.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | +23.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.87 | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.35% | 15.12% |
| Max drawdown | -14.48% | -40.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INTL and FNDF
Explore further