Screener
INTL vs GEME
Main International ETF vs Pacific NoS Global EM Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- GEME costs 0.09% less per year.
- INTL is classified as alternative, while GEME is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- INTL follows a option income strategy; GEME uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTL | GEME | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.84% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $222M | $265M |
| Since | 2022 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.37% | 4.11% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.7% | +72.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.26% | 20.99% |
| Max drawdown | -14.48% | -16.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INTL and GEME
Explore further