Screener
INTL vs XRLX
Main International ETF vs FundX Conservative ETF
Key differences
- INTL costs 0.36% less per year.
- INTL is significantly larger than XRLX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INTL is classified as alternative, while XRLX is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- INTL follows a option income strategy; XRLX uses active selection.
- XRLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTL | XRLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.84% | 1.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $222M | $51M |
| Since | 2022 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 2.37% | 2.68% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.7% | +17.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.26% | 8.09% |
| Max drawdown | -14.48% | -15.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INTL and XRLX
Explore further