Screener
INVN vs RFFC
Alger Russell Innovation ETF vs ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF
Key differences
- RFFC costs 0.07% less per year.
- INVN follows a index tracking strategy; RFFC uses active selection.
- RFFC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| INVN | RFFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11M | $29M |
| Since | 2025 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.2% | +29.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.34% | 12.11% |
| Max drawdown | -26.01% | -36.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INVN and RFFC
Explore further