Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

IOO vs MXI

iShares Global 100 ETF vs iShares Global Materials ETF

IOO

iShares Global 100 ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.40%

Fund size

$8.5B

MXI

iShares Global Materials ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$325M

Key differences

  • IOO is significantly larger than MXI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, IOO has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • IOO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

IOOMXI
Annual cost (TER)0.40%0.39%
Fund size (AUM)$8.5B$325M
Since20002006
Dividend yield0.86%1.78%
Asset classequityequity
Regionglobalglobal
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+42.2%+33.9%
CAGR 3Y+25.9%+13.9%
CAGR 5Y+17.3%+6.7%
Sharpe 3Y1.310.61
Volatility 1Y13.60%19.47%
Max drawdown-31.43%-39.52%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to IOO and MXI