Screener
IPAV vs BOTZ
Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF vs Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF
Key differences
- IPAV costs 0.13% less per year.
- BOTZ is significantly larger than IPAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BOTZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IPAV | BOTZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $3.4B |
| Since | 2024 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.14% | 0.62% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.9% | +32.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.59 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.97% | 24.09% |
| Max drawdown | -14.59% | -55.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IPAV and BOTZ
Explore further