Screener
IPAV vs GNOM
Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF vs Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF
Key differences
- GNOM costs 0.05% less per year.
- GNOM is significantly larger than IPAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IPAV covers global markets; GNOM covers north america.
- GNOM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IPAV | GNOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $51M |
| Since | 2024 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.14% | 1.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.2% | +57.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | -1.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -10.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.09% | 26.22% |
| Max drawdown | -14.59% | -75.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IPAV and GNOM
Explore further