Screener
IPAY vs FDRS
Amplify Digital Payments ETF vs Corgi ETF Trust I
Key differences
- FDRS costs 0.26% less per year.
- IPAY is classified as equity, while FDRS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- IPAY follows a index tracking strategy; FDRS uses leveraged.
- IPAY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IPAY | FDRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $174M | $77M |
| Since | 2015 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.87% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -18.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -7.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.11 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.27% | — |
| Max drawdown | -51.75% | -21.64% |
Similar to IPAY and FDRS
Explore further