Screener
IPAY vs GAMR
Amplify Digital Payments ETF vs Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF
Key differences
- GAMR costs 0.16% less per year.
- IPAY is significantly larger than GAMR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, GAMR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IPAY | GAMR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $174M | $37M |
| Since | 2015 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.87% | 0.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -18.0% | +20.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.4% | +14.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | -7.0% | +0.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.11 | 0.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.27% | 22.42% |
| Max drawdown | -51.75% | -54.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IPAY and GAMR
Explore further