Screener
ISBG vs AMAX
IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF vs Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
Key differences
Both ISBG and AMAX are alternative ETFs. ISBG charges 1.14% a year and AMAX 1.36%. The main difference: ISBG follows a active selection strategy; AMAX uses option income.
- ISBG follows a active selection strategy; AMAX uses option income.
- ISBG costs 0.22% less per year.
- AMAX is much larger than ISBG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- AMAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISBG | AMAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.14% | 1.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $64M |
| Since | 2026 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | — | 10.96% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +9.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.50 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.26% |
| Max drawdown | -49.42% | -16.25% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.