Screener
ISBG vs CCOR
IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF vs Core Alternative ETF
Key differences
Both ISBG and CCOR are alternative ETFs. ISBG charges 1.14% a year and CCOR 1.29%. The main difference: ISBG follows a active selection strategy; CCOR uses option income.
- ISBG follows a active selection strategy; CCOR uses option income.
- ISBG costs 0.15% less per year.
- CCOR is much larger than ISBG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- CCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISBG | CCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.14% | 1.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $27M |
| Since | 2026 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.10% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | -3.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | -1.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 7.22% |
| Max drawdown | -51.76% | -22.99% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.