Screener
ISCB vs FNDA
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF vs Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF
Key differences
- ISCB costs 0.21% less per year.
- FNDA is significantly larger than ISCB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ISCB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISCB | FNDA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $269M | $10.2B |
| Since | 2004 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 1.29% | 1.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.8% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.1% | +16.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.9% | +7.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.63% | 17.24% |
| Max drawdown | -44.18% | -44.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ISCB and FNDA
Explore further