Screener
ISCF vs IXUS
iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
Key differences
- IXUS costs 0.17% less per year.
- IXUS is significantly larger than ISCF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ISCF covers global markets; IXUS covers global ex us.
- Over the last 3 years, IXUS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISCF | IXUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $633M | $56.2B |
| Since | 2015 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 3.52% | 2.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.9% | +32.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.5% | +19.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.2% | +9.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.90 | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.44% | 15.40% |
| Max drawdown | -40.79% | -36.22% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ISCF and IXUS
Explore further