Screener
ISCF vs OMFS
iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF vs Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- ISCF costs 0.15% less per year.
- ISCF covers global markets; OMFS covers north america.
- ISCF follows a index tracking strategy; OMFS uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, ISCF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISCF | OMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $633M | $275M |
| Since | 2015 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 3.52% | 0.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.5% | +30.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | +15.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.1% | +6.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.89 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.40% | 17.63% |
| Max drawdown | -40.79% | -42.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ISCF and OMFS
Explore further