Screener
ISCF vs XJR
iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF vs iShares ESG Select Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- XJR costs 0.12% less per year.
- ISCF is significantly larger than XJR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ISCF covers global markets; XJR covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, ISCF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ISCF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISCF | XJR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.12% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $633M | $138M |
| Since | 2015 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 3.52% | 1.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.5% | +29.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | +15.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.1% | +5.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.89 | 0.61 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.40% | 17.92% |
| Max drawdown | -40.79% | -27.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ISCF and XJR
Explore further